SYSONLINE
UTC2026-04-21 03:56:25Z
SCAN2026-04-20
VER0.4.0
FEEDSFLEET15hSEO10hGSC3d lagGA41d lagAHREFSweeklyDFSlive
VIEWNODE · TAKE-N-TOKE
NODE // TAKE-N-TOKEONLINE
Take N' Toke
tnt-dispensary.netlify.app ↗ARCHETYPE · funTIER · criticalEDITABLE
Weekly Brief · Haiku
all briefs →Take-N-Toke holds a 69 overall score with strong local SEO (100) and schema implementation (100), but compliance failures (22.2%) and low AI readiness (51) pose operational risk. Domain rating of 92 indicates strong authority baseline, though organic keyword tracking shows 0 capture—suggests tracking gap or content indexation issue.
Wins
Local SEO & Schema Excellence
Perfect 100 scores in local_seo and schema_pct categories. Solid foundation for local pack visibility and rich snippet eligibility in cannabis dispensary searches.
Domain Authority Stable
Domain rating of 92 reflects strong backlink profile. No regressed deploys in 14d (0). Positions site well for competitive cannabis keywords once content/compliance gaps close.
Risks
Compliance Failures Blocking Visibility
22.2% of compliance rules failing. Cannabis content is heavily regulated; failures may trigger manual actions or de-ranking in Google local/organic results, limiting reach.
AI Readiness & EEAT Gaps
AI readiness at 51, EEAT at 58—both below 70 threshold. Low AEO score (35) indicates poor AI-generated content optimization and entity credibility signals weak for botanical/product queries.
Next actions
P0Audit & Remediate Compliance Failures
Inventory all 22 failing compliance rules (age-gating, medical claims, product descriptions, licensing badges). Prioritize high-impact violations affecting product pages. Engage legal/compliance counsel specific to cannabis regulations.
P0Fix Ahrefs Indexation/Tracking
Verify site is crawlable in Ahrefs and GSC. Re-audit robots.txt, sitemap, canonical tags. Confirm no noindex on product/menu pages. Escalate to Ahrefs support if site is indexed but keywords/traffic show 0.
Score Decomposition
Δ7d: — · Δ30d: —
Needs ≥ 2 scorecard runs spanning 7 days. Framework is live — decomposition will auto-populate as history accrues.
Archetype Benchmark — fun
n=10 · median 70Overall 45th percentile within fun · -1 vs cohort median
Biggest gaps to cohort median
ai readiness51 vs median 65 · leader 90-14
eeat58 vs median 69 · leader 81-11
aeo35 vs median 46 · leader 85-11
[ SCORE ]SEO HEALTH · 11-CATEGORY RUBRIC
69
OVERALL SCORE
Technical
—
Content
69
Authority
—
UX / Perf
—
Local SEO
100
On-Page
70
Mobile
—
AI Readiness
51
Schema %
100
E-E-A-T
58
AEO
35
Clicks
0
GSC · 28d
Impressions
0
GSC · 28d
Avg Position
—
GSC · 28d
Sessions
0
GA4 · 28d
Conversions
0
GA4 · 28d
Revenue
$0
GA4 · 28d
28-day trends
GSC Clicks
latest 0 · total 0
insufficient data
GSC Impressions
latest 0 · total 0
insufficient data
GA4 Sessions
latest 0 · total 0
insufficient data
GA4 Conversions
latest 0 · total 0
insufficient data
Top Queries (7d)
No GSC query data.
Top Pages — GSC (7d)
No page data.
Top Pages — GA4 Traffic (7d)
No GA4 page data.
SCAN · PER-URL
Per-page scoring (4 URLs · median 56)
Client scores are averages across pages. This breaks that down — the pages at the bottom are the ones dragging your category scores down.
▼ 5 worst pages
56
on-page 68schema 55ai 45
• missing: title (20-60 chars)• missing: meta description (50-160 chars)• AI gap: FAQPage for AI extraction
56
on-page 68schema 55ai 45
• missing: title (20-60 chars)• missing: meta description (50-160 chars)• AI gap: FAQPage for AI extraction
56
on-page 68schema 55ai 45
• missing: meta description (50-160 chars)• missing: self-canonical• missing: OG title/desc/image
56
on-page 68schema 55ai 45
• missing: meta description (50-160 chars)• missing: self-canonical• missing: OG title/desc/image
▲ 5 best pages
56
on-page 68schema 55ai 45
56
on-page 68schema 55ai 45
56
on-page 68schema 55ai 45
56
on-page 68schema 55ai 45