SYSONLINE
UTC2026-04-21 03:56:24Z
SCAN2026-04-20
VER0.4.0
FEEDSFLEET15hSEO10hGSC3d lagGA41d lagAHREFSweeklyDFSlive
VIEWNODE · COTTONMOUTH
NODE // COTTONMOUTHONLINE
Cottonmouth Dispensary
cottonmouth-dispensary.netlify.app ↗ARCHETYPE · funTIER · criticalEDITABLE
Weekly Brief · Haiku
all briefs →Cottonmouth holds a 74 overall score with strong local SEO (100) and schema markup (100), but faces headwinds in AEO (52) and on-page optimization (63). No organic traffic detected in Ahrefs snapshot; compliance failures at 11.1% warrant immediate audit.
Wins
Perfect Local SEO & Schema Coverage
Local SEO score: 100, schema_pct: 100. Strong foundation for cannabis dispensary local pack visibility.
High Domain Authority Baseline
Domain Rating 92 indicates strong backlink profile relative to sector. Solid competitive position for authority-driven rankings.
Risks
Zero Organic Traffic & Keywords Detected
Ahrefs reports 0 organic keywords and 0 organic traffic. Critical gap—site may not be indexed properly or rankings collapsed.
AEO Score Critically Low
AI Readiness: 66, AEO score: 52. Poor AI-generated search optimization; content may not rank in AI overview results.
Next actions
P0Audit Indexation & GSC Health
Pull GSC coverage report immediately. Verify site:cottonmouth queries return results. Check robots.txt, canonicals, and noindex tags. Zero organic traffic suggests indexation failure, not ranking weakness.
P0Compliance Audit & Regional Policy Alignment
Audit all pages for cannabis-specific policy violations (age gates, claims, medical disclaimers). 11.1% failure rate suggests systematic issue—fix before pursuing traffic gains.
Score Decomposition
Δ7d: — · Δ30d: —
Needs ≥ 2 scorecard runs spanning 7 days. Framework is live — decomposition will auto-populate as history accrues.
Archetype Benchmark — fun
n=10 · median 70Overall 95th percentile within fun · +4 vs cohort median
✓ At or above cohort median in every category.
[ SCORE ]SEO HEALTH · 11-CATEGORY RUBRIC
74
OVERALL SCORE
Technical
—
Content
69
Authority
—
UX / Perf
—
Local SEO
100
On-Page
63
Mobile
—
AI Readiness
66
Schema %
100
E-E-A-T
70
AEO
52
Clicks
0
GSC · 28d
Impressions
0
GSC · 28d
Avg Position
—
GSC · 28d
Sessions
0
GA4 · 28d
Conversions
0
GA4 · 28d
Revenue
$0
GA4 · 28d
28-day trends
GSC Clicks
latest 0 · total 0
insufficient data
GSC Impressions
latest 0 · total 0
insufficient data
GA4 Sessions
latest 0 · total 0
insufficient data
GA4 Conversions
latest 0 · total 0
insufficient data
Top Queries (7d)
No GSC query data.
Top Pages — GSC (7d)
No page data.
Top Pages — GA4 Traffic (7d)
No GA4 page data.
SCAN · PER-URL
Per-page scoring (4 URLs · median 63)
Client scores are averages across pages. This breaks that down — the pages at the bottom are the ones dragging your category scores down.
▼ 5 worst pages
52
on-page 56schema 55ai 45
• missing: title (20-60 chars)• missing: meta description (50-160 chars)• missing: self-canonical
52
on-page 56schema 55ai 45
• missing: title (20-60 chars)• missing: meta description (50-160 chars)• missing: self-canonical
63
on-page 68schema 57ai 65
• missing: title (20-60 chars)• missing: self-canonical• AI gap: Speakable voice-search
63
on-page 68schema 57ai 65
• missing: title (20-60 chars)• missing: self-canonical• AI gap: Speakable voice-search
▲ 5 best pages
63
on-page 68schema 57ai 65
63
on-page 68schema 57ai 65
52
on-page 56schema 55ai 45
52
on-page 56schema 55ai 45